Digital Governance for AI

AI without rules creates chaos.

DAC turns agreements into rules AI can follow.

Agreements define what people, software, and AI systems may, must, and must not do. DAC makes those rules usable by AI while keeping every result tied to its source and human authority.

ClauseFlow · Institutional credit

Exposure and opportunity rarely sit in one clause.

Most AI tools identify which clauses exist. ClauseFlow traces how the clauses work together, shows the path visually, and links every finding to the governing language.

Every material finding remains linked to the governing source and subject to expert review.

01

Risk comes from interactions

A provision that looks harmless alone can create exposure when combined with a definition, exception, basket, or release term.

02

Standard AI can miss the chain

Clause-by-clause review can miss how one provision changes the effect of another.

03

ClauseFlow makes the chain reviewable

Follow the cited path through the agreement and inspect the language behind each finding.

Why DAC exists

Agreements already govern behavior.

They say who may do what, what they must do, what they must not do, and what happens when something changes or goes wrong.

As AI takes on more work, it needs those rules in a form it can use. Every result stays tied to the source and the people or institutions that set the rules.

Space · mining + robotics

May the drill engage at these coordinates?

Conditional · §4.2

The drill may engage because the coordinates fall within the authorized extraction zone and torque, thermal, and power conditions remain inside mission limits.

Agreement
system
Run-to-run consistency

Same agreement. Same question. AI alone may take a different path each time.

An AI model rereads and reasons over the agreement on each run. ClauseFlow follows the same saved provision path, keeping every finding tied to the same cited language for review.

Same document · same query · three runs May collateral leave without lender consent?
Standalone AIRUN 01 / 03
AI answerVaries by run

Yes, the agreement appears to permit it.

ClauseFlowRUN 01 / 03
Cited answerSame every run

Conditional: only if capacity remains. No separate consent condition appears in the cited pathway.

Standalone AI: the reasoning may change when the document is reread.ClauseFlow: the same question follows the same cited path.
What ClauseFlow adds

More coverage. Faster first review. Knowledge the team can reuse.

ClauseFlow expands the terms and interactions a team can review, brings clause-grounded evidence forward sooner, and preserves findings across the portfolio.

Structural depth800+

Structural elements per agreement

Track vulnerabilities, protections, blockers, calculations, and connected pathways across each agreement.
Structural coverage5–7×

Broader structural coverage

Compared with the seven to nine headline issues commonly prioritized in manual review.
Decision speedSame Day

First-pass visibility

Bring clause-grounded analysis forward before the transaction, amendment, trade, or legal queue moves.
Institutional memory0 → 1

Institutional memory

Create a queryable record of negotiated terms, protections, structural pathways, and precedent across the agreements under coverage.
How DAC works

Help your AI understand the agreement.

DAC connects the terms, related documents, and versions that shape an answer. Through its API, it makes that work available to the AI and systems you already use.

How DAC works Agreement components
01 · Source
Governing source Agreement + version
02 · Connect
Rights + obligations
Conditions + exceptions
Representations + warranties
Events + remedies
03 · Understand
Resolved stateCovenants + restrictions
04 · Use
Improve existing AIReuse the workAPI / MCP

Every result links back to the agreement, clause path, and version.

The agreement, related documents, and relevant version form the source.
Why credit first

Corporate credit depends on agreement interpretation.

Investment decisions across origination, underwriting, portfolio management, trading, and restructuring with support from risk and legal depend on how the agreement is read.

ClauseFlow is built for institutional corporate credit, where connected provisions can change the outcome of an investment, amendment, or restructuring.

01

CLO and leveraged-loan managers

Query protections, pathways, concentrations, amendments, and precedent across large loan portfolios.

02

Private-credit and direct-lending platforms

Test negotiated protections, sponsor requests, amendment language, structural capacity, and accepted precedent.

03

Credit-focused and multi-strategy asset managers

Connect downside underwriting, relative value, distressed analysis, special situations, and legal diligence.

04

Banks and dealer platforms

Support leveraged finance, loan capital markets, trading, restructuring, legal, and risk workflows.

ClauseFlow

Follow the path from clause to exposure.

ClauseFlow connects each provision in the chain, shows the interaction visually, and links the result back to the agreement.

ClauseFlowcited agreement analysis
Ready for a questionProject Helix Credit Agreement · 412 pages
Source agreementPage 287 of 412
Execution copy · illustrative

Project Helix Credit Agreement

Dated as of March 14, 2024 · Senior secured facilities

§5.13 · Designation of subsidiaries

The Borrower may designate any Restricted Subsidiary as an Unrestricted Subsidiary if, immediately after giving effect, the designation is permitted as an Investment under Section 6.04.

§6.04(q) · Investments

Investments may be made in an aggregate amount not to exceed the greater of $500,000,000 and 26.0% of Adjusted EBITDA, subject to the conditions stated herein.

§9.09(d) · Release of collateral

Upon any Subsidiary becoming an Unrestricted Subsidiary, the Liens on its property shall be automatically released without further action by any Secured Party.

Connected pathway3 provisions · fully cited
Agreement Credit agreement document set
Conditional right Designation permitted? §5.13
Capacity test Capacity remains? §6.04(q)
Automatic effect Lien release automatic §9.09(d)
Not in cited path If consent were required counterfactual protection
Potential exposure

Potential collateral release

Secured lendersConditional
Ask ClauseFlowAgreement scope
You

Can collateral leave without lender consent?

Tracing controlling provisions
ClauseFlow

Potentially, if capacity remains. §5.13 makes designation contingent on §6.04; if that test passes, §9.09(d) automatically releases the liens. No separate lender-consent condition appears in this pathway.

§5.13§6.04(q)§9.09(d)3 provisions cited

Ask a question…

Enter to send

Product preview uses a fictional agreement and an illustrative scenario. Every answer remains subject to expert review.

Formula Composer

See how one definition changes the result.

Definitions, baskets, ratios, and covenants depend on one another. Change one input to see its effect on capacity, leverage compliance, headroom, and any connected pathway.

Every supported number remains linked to the clause behind it.

Formula Composerequations extracted from the text · chained · computed
§1.01 · Definitions Adjusted EBITDA means EBITDA for such period plus, without duplication, cost savings and synergies (uncapped)…
Eadj = E + ∑i Ai
machine formAdjEBITDA = EBITDA + Σ Addbacks
§6.04(q) · Investments …Investments not to exceed the greater of $500,000,000 and 26.0% of Adjusted EBITDA…
B = max( 500, 0.26 Eadj ) $M
machine formBasket = max($500M, 26% × AdjEBITDA)
§7.11 · Financial covenant …shall not permit the First Lien Net Leverage Ratio to exceed 3.50 : 1.00…
λ = DnetEadj ≤ 3.50
machine formFLNLR = NetDebt ÷ AdjEBITDA ≤ 3.50×
E · EBITDA$1,840Minput
∑A · Addbacks$260Minput
Dnet · Net debt$6,900Minput
Eadj · Adj EBITDA$2,100M§1.01
B · Basket$546M§6.04(q)
λ · FLNLR3.29×§7.11 · cap 3.50×
⊢ compliant · 3.29× ≤ 3.50× · incremental headroom $450M

Every result remains auditable from input to clause.

Across the portfolio

Find the same risk across the portfolio.

See whether an exposure mechanism is isolated, recurring, or concentrated.

Illustrative portfolio13 agreements · fictional data

Attention queue

Agreements ranked by material harm and compounding pathways

01
Asteron Consumer HoldingsSenior Secured Credit Agreement · 2024
3 critical findings
02
Meridian Energy PartnersFirst-Lien Credit Agreement · 2023
Compounding
03
Harborstone MaterialsCredit Facilities Agreement · 2024
2 high findings
04
Northline Retail GroupSecured Notes Agreement · 2022
1 critical finding

Severity by agreement

Where harm concentrates across the book

Asteron Consumer2 C · 8 H · 3 M
Meridian Energy1 C · 4 H
Harborstone Materials2 H · 2 M
Northline Retail1 C · 1 H
Hearthland Home1 M

Recurring mechanisms

Exposure patterns repeating across agreements

Collateral release6 / 13
Uptier priming5 / 13
Incremental debt5 / 13
Sacred rights gaps4 / 13
Double-claim structure2 / 13
29 cited findings · 13 agreementsIllustrative data · no live portfolio information

Thirteen agreements arrive as individual documents.

01

Keep agreed terms and findings together.

Build a searchable record of negotiated terms, protections, connected provisions, and precedent.

02

See how provisions interact.

Trace LME, covenant, collateral, priming, amendment, voting, and restructuring paths.

03

Review the source behind each finding.

Inspect the controlling language, connected path, calculations, assumptions, ambiguity, and review points.

04

Reach a first review sooner.

Bring clause-grounded evidence forward before a financing, amendment deadline, sponsor request, or repricing event.

05

Keep findings current.

Connect amendments, update selected calculations and protections, and identify changed exposure.

Operational targets
10×target review throughput
24 hourstarget amendment coverage
8–10workflow layers removed
30–50%less first-pass effort targeted

Targets describe intended operating performance and remain subject to workflow, agreement, and evaluation scope.

Internal benchmark · two credit agreements

DAC produces precise, accurate, and complete analysis.

Rather than relying on a single AI model, DAC combines findings from multiple models. It then reviews the complete analysis and corrects or removes anything that does not pass review, resulting in 71 of 71 pathways found and zero failures in this benchmark.

How much each system found

More is better · DAC's 71-pathway reference set

DAC
71 / 7137
GPT-6 Astra
53 / 7133
Claude Opus 5
20 / 7133
Gemini 3.8 Flash
14 / 7115

Pathways that fail review

Smaller bars are better · Number of failed pathways

DefectiveDisprovedBlocked
DAC
0 / 710%0 defective · 0 disproved · 0 blocked
GPT-6 Astra
3 / 614.9%0 defective · 0 disproved · 3 blocked
Claude Opus 5
16 / 2857.1%10 defective · 3 disproved · 3 blocked
Gemini 3.8 Flash
10 / 1758.8%5 defective · 2 disproved · 3 blocked
Novel mechanisms
37novel mechanisms

12% more than the next best shown.37 vs 33.

Pathway coverage
34%broader coverage

71 reference pathways found.Next best shown: 53.

Fewer failures
0 / 71failed review

No DAC pathway failed review.Other systems shown: 4.9%–76.5% failed.

Scope note. Internal DAC benchmark · DAC-created reference set · Model-based review only · No human adjudication · DAC corrects or withdraws faults; competitors assessed as delivered · Results limited to systems shown · Not a production guarantee.
First application · ClauseFlow

Credit is where DAC starts.

ClauseFlow applies DAC to institutional credit. The same approach applies wherever agreements govern decisions and actions.

Explore ClauseFlow
New · Internal benchmarkDAC led on coverage and novel mechanisms. 71 / 71reference pathways found 37novel mechanisms 0pathways failed review See the evidence →
01 · Trace

Follow the answer back to the provisions.

02 · Review

Check the source and assumptions.

03 · Compare

Compare terms across agreements and versions.

Our mission

Empower humanity to command the intelligence it creates.

People set the rules. DAC helps intelligent systems operate within the authority people and institutions define.

Founders
Portrait of Anish Patel

Anish Patel

Founder & CEO

Saw firsthand during the financial crisis how small clauses in agreements could move billions of dollars. Was on the advisory team that supported the issuance of Lehman's final CLO the week before the bank's failure. Leads DAC's product, architecture, and institutional partnerships.

Portrait of Shalu Maheshwari

Shalu Maheshwari, Esq.

Co-Founder & General Counsel

Senior IP litigator and strategist turned technology operator. Defines the legal and conceptual architecture that carries agreement logic into engineering and product design while overseeing IP strategy, compliance, and go-to-market frameworks.

Advisors
Portrait of Dr. Edward Hunter

Dr. Edward Hunter

Director of Engineering, Johns Hopkins DS&AI Institute

AI and computer-vision pioneer whose work in visual tracking and large-scale AI systems helped shape modern motion-capture infrastructure. Advises on technical architecture and long-term AI strategy.

Portrait of Howard Widra

Howard Widra

Former Head of Direct Originations at Apollo; Former CEO and Chairman at MidCap Financial

Private-credit and capital-markets leader who deployed billions in capital and scaled a leading lending platform; brings deep institutional investor relationships.

Portrait of Wayne C. Plewniak

Wayne C. Plewniak

Managing Director & Head of Fixed Income, GAMCO/Gabelli

Institutional fixed-income leader with deep credit expertise and buy-side relationships.

Portrait of Jason Turner

Jason Turner

Chief Executive Officer, Entanglement, Inc.

Quantum and AI infrastructure entrepreneur; former QED-C (NIST) workforce lead. Advises on scalable AI systems and research partnerships.

Portrait of Tyler Weiss

Tyler Weiss

VFX Producer, Image Engine

Emmy-nominated producer in game and film visual effects.

VFXGame of Thrones, Avatar: The Last Airbender, Alien: Romulus, 3 Body Problem, and Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore.

GamingThe Lord of the Rings, FIFA, Madden NFL, Batman: Arkham Asylum, and Deus Ex.

Talk with DAC

Give AI the rules before it answers or acts.

Start with answers tied to the agreement.

Test ClauseFlow

Test one agreement your team already knows.

Bring one agreement and one known exposure path. ClauseFlow traces the provisions, conditions, and calculations behind it.

Build with DAC

Build the agreement layer.

Whether you are shaping an institution, a consequential AI system, or the next application of DAC's infrastructure, we would like to hear from you.